NameCheap Sucks

NameCheap is the worst possible domain registrar.

They are completely incompetent and offer ZERO useable tech support. Their tech support people are rude idiots, monkeys could do a better job.

If you are thinking about using NameCheap you might want to think again. What kind of company doesn’t even have telephone numbers available to their customers?  What kind of company hides behind their email address and won’t even publish their names?  The kind of company that is hiding and cheating people.  Fraudsters that’s what kind of company.

NameCheap Sucks

They completely bungled a domain transfer, then canceled my transfer, then refused to refund my money.

NameCheap Sucks

Then next they accused me of committing fraud, blocked my email address and are trying to take my domains hostage.

You would think NameCheap would want to follow through on an order and fix the problems, instead they just cut you off… steal your money and accuse you of doing something wrong.  It’s pathetic.

NameCheap Sucks!

Xomba Sucks

Don’t waste your time with these self righteous idiots.

The interface is horrible. You can link to nothing.  Total Waste of time.

It’s all about them, and they offer you nothing useful to help you create content.

Xomba Sucks the Big Donkey

If you think you can make money writing on their site you are the idiot.

Pathetic Adsense Share site where you will do nothing but waste your time.

If you want to do Adsense Rev Share then HubPages is really the only decent place. If you want to do a ton of writing and can’t get an Adsense Account or other Accounts then Squidoo is the place you want to be.

Xomba Sucks!

Update: Jan 2011 – I’m swamped and can not currently take on any more projects. Thanks

Are you interested in hiring an Internet Marketing Specialist?  You could do an online search and try to outsource from a company that you have never heard of before.  You could call a recruiting company and use them to find someone that has credentials that appeal to your company.   You could run an advertisement in the local Newspaper for an Internet Marketing Specialist.  But how would you know that the person you are hiring has any real experience.

Many people talk the talk but few walk the walk.  You don’t need a business degree, a computer science degree or any degree for that matter to be successful online.  Many of the most successful online marketing specialists have no educational credentials.  What is far more important is a proven track record of success and that is typically measured in income.

You see money is the ultimate measure of just how good an individual is at taking an ordinary business idea and pushing it to the top online.  While having an educational background may help, it’s no assurance that it will bring the results you or your company are looking to achieve.

So when you think of hiring an Internet Marketing Specialist don’t overlook the value of experience.  I’m available for certain projects on a piecemeal basis.  The advantage to you is 15 years real online experience.  You won’t need to provide any benefits or create a payroll.  Work will be completed online and on time!  My areas of expertise are:

WordPress Installation and Set up.

WordPress Maintenance.

SEO Site Consulting

Article writing and distribution.

Keyword Research and Campaigns.

Local Search Optimization

Author:  George Carlin

“Forget the politicians. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice . . . you don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own, and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought, and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying . . . lobbying, to get what they want . . . Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I’ll tell you what they don’t want . . . they don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that . . . that doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. That’s right. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table and think about how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fuckin’ years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers . . . Obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork. And just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it, and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your fuckin’ retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something? They’ll get it . . . they’ll get it all from you sooner or later cause they own this fuckin’ place. It’s a big club and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in The big club. By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head with their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table has tilted folks. The game is rigged and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. Good honest hard-working people . . . white collar, blue collar it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on. Good honest hard-working people continue, these are people of modest means . . . continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don’t give a fuck about you. They don’t give a fuck about you . . . they don’t give a fuck about you. They don’t care about you at all . . . at all . . . at all, and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. That’s what the owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain willfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that’s being jammed up their assholes everyday, because the owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American Dream cause you have to be asleep to believe it . . .”

How Common Credit Mistakes Affect Scores

Comment Luv

It’s pretty common knowledge that Blogs that use the Comment Luv plug in want you to leave comments.

You can learn about and download the Comment Luv Plug in here:

Comment Luv

You can find blogs using the comment luv plugin with this search string:

“Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage +niche keyword”

Happy Commenting and be sure to leave an intelligent comment!

WASHINGTON – The federal budget deficit has surged to an all-time high of $1.42 trillion as the recession caused tax revenues to plunge while the government was spending massive amounts to stabilize the financial system and jump-start the economy.

The imbalance for the budget year ended Sept. 30, more than tripled last year’s record. The Obama administration projects deficits will total $9.1 trillion over the next decade unless corrective action is taken.

As a portion of the economy, the budget deficit stood at 10 percent, the highest since World War II, according to government data released Friday.

President Barack Obama has pledged to reduce the deficit once the Great Recession ends and the unemployment rate starts falling. But economists worry the government lacks the will to make the hard political choices to cut spending and raise taxes to get control of the imbalances.

For 2009, the government collected $2.10 trillion in revenues, a 16.6 percent drop from 2008. The plunge reflected declining income tax collections as millions of Americans lost their jobs or saw their wages cut. Corporate taxes also plummeted as the recession squeezed companies’ profit margins.

Government spending last year jumped to $3.52 trillion, up 18.2 percent over 2008. The $700 billion financial bailout fund and increased spending and tax relief from the $787 billion economic stimulus program that Obama pushed through Congress in February drove the increase.

For September, a month when the government usually records surpluses, the deficit totaled $46.6 billion. That’s a sharp contrast to the $45.7 billion surplus in September 2008, the last time the government’s books were in the black.

In issuing the final budget figures, top administration officials said the president was determined to get control of the deficits in coming years.

“It was critical that we acted to bring the economy back from the brink earlier this year,” White House budget director Peter Orszag said in a statement. “The president recognizes that we need to put the nation back on a fiscally sustainable path.”

Failure to curb runaway deficits could trigger a financial train wreck that would push interest rates and inflation higher, and send the dollar crashing if foreigners suddenly started dumping their holdings of Treasury securities.

None of those problems are evident now as the worst recession since the 1930s has depressed borrowing by consumers and businesses, giving the government a break on the interest it paid this year on the record debt. Net interest payments actually fell by about $10 billion in 2009 from 2008.

But economists worry investors will grow fearful of the nation’s ability to repay all the debt unless the administration and Congress begin developing credible plans to deal with the deficit problem once the recession has ended and unemployment has begun to come down.

What is it with these banks that are so quick to hit you with a fee for spending more than you have in your checking account but take their own sweet time in crediting deposits?

My colleague Andrew Martin and I heard that complaint repeatedly from readers after we wrote about overdraft fees earlier this month. The angry questions happened to arrive as we approach the five-year anniversary of when the federal law known as Check 21 took effect. The law allows banks to turn paper checks into digital images and settle them electronically instead of shipping bags of paper around the country on airplanes.

Once banks embraced the new procedures, money disappeared from your account much faster when you wrote a check. But the old laws on how quickly banks must credit your account when you make a deposit did not change at all. They still haven’t. In fact, they haven’t changed in more than 20 years.

In part because of that, consumers are suspicious that banks earn more money by not making the funds available until they absolutely have to. Banks, meanwhile, say that they often make deposited funds available before they know that the checks haven’t bounced.

The banks and the Federal Reserve have made some progress in speeding up many deposits. But the rules — and especially their exceptions — still trip up plenty of people.

So first, a refresher course on the rules, the ones the bank explained to you when you signed up for an account in a fine print document that you probably ignored. (I’ve posted links to more detailed explanations from the online version of this article.)

Banks are supposed to allow you to withdraw the following types of deposits no later than the next business day after the bank receives them: cash, electronic payments like paychecks and other direct deposits, government checks, postal money orders and cashier’s checks. That said, if you don’t make the deposits in person (say, if it’s through an A.T.M.), there may be further delay.

For other checks, the Federal Reserve rule that governs deposits makes a distinction between local checks and nonlocal checks. Once you deposit your check in your own bank, it may go to a Federal Reserve check processing center before it heads to the bank of the person or company who wrote it. If the same center services both banks, then the check is local. If not, it’s nonlocal.

Banks must make your deposits of local checks available no later than two business days after you hand them over. But they get a full five days on nonlocal accounts. In either case, they must make $100 available to you the next business day after the deposit as a sort of good-faith advance. That number, too, has not changed in two decades.

One piece of good news here is that because of the rapid adoption of electronic check imaging, the Federal Reserve is a year or so away from completing the consolidation of all its processing centers. As a result, many more checks are already local. So when you deposit them, they hit your account more quickly.

The bad news, however, is that there are still a number of exceptions that allow banks to put a hold on part or all of the deposit, often for at least five business days. Any deposit over $5,000 is automatically suspect. If your account has been overdrawn at least six days in the last six months, then the bank can delay all deposits to your account. If your account is less than 30 days old, then your bank gets the extra time there, too (plenty of fraud happens in new accounts).

The large deposit exception ensnares plenty of people, according to Gail Hillebrand, senior attorney for Consumers Union. They include those who are paid on commission or quarterly and those earning royalties, and a large number of others moving money around from, say, a brokerage account to their checking account to pay big medical or tuition bills or buy a car or house.

She suggested taking an active approach with the bank when big money is involved, deposit by deposit. “Ask the bank if there will be a hold and how soon you can have the money. Don’t assume it’s going to be there because the teller smiled at you and accepted it,” she said. “If you’re moving money for a big payment, do it well in advance.”

Banks can and do move faster than the regulations require. And some have pushed their daily deadlines for depositors later by a few hours. Credit unions, in particular, tend to clear deposits more quickly, according to a 2007 Federal Reserve study of the effect of Check 21.

But you can’t count on that happening. So if you can’t keep a cushion in your checking account to protect yourself from running out of money while waiting for deposits, there are a few other available tactics.

Use direct deposit for everything you possibly can, from government benefit checks to tax refunds to reimbursement from your health insurer or flexible spending account administrator. Freelancers who do regular work for large companies can often receive payment via direct deposit, too.

If you’re sending money to a child in school or supporting a relative in some other way, you’ll spare yourself a lot of desperate phone calls if you can find a way to transfer money electronically into their account from your own linked account, say by listing yourself on the account with them.

There’s one big win for consumers arising from Check 21 that should have happened by now but mostly hasn’t. It’s something bankers like to call remote deposit capture. In plain English, that means you scan the check using your home computer and send it to the bank without having to bother with envelopes and mailboxes or remembering to stop at the branch in person.

Banks were fairly quick to make this available for their biggest customers — businesses. But only a couple of hundred banks or credit unions have given it to consumers so far, according to Bob Meara, a senior analyst with Celent, a financial services consulting firm.

The early adopters tend to be institutions like USAA Federal Savings Bank, which has only one branch but has lots of customers serving in the United States military who don’t want to send money in from an Army base. In fact, the bank has gone a step further and created an iPhone application that allows many of its customers to take pictures of their checks and deposit them that way. One in four of the bank’s check deposits now arrive remotely.

Customers of bigger banks could get their deposits into their bank accounts a lot faster if only the institutions were willing to let them move money this way. So why don’t they?

According to Mr. Meara, 90 percent of all transactions with bank tellers involve checks. If everyone had an iPhone deposit app, people wouldn’t come into the branch as often. That would be fine had banks not invested so much time and energy in training branch workers to persuade checking account customers to move into more profitable products.

“One the one hand, fewer deposit transactions could mean a headcount reduction,” he said. “But it invites the erosion of store profitability. The banks are struggling with the enormity of what it means.”

It can’t hurt to ask your bank for this sort of deposit-at-home service. But Mr. Meara thinks it will be many years before everyone gets to use it. That’s too bad. Until the Federal Reserve acts to tighten the deposit crediting rules further, having more ways to make deposits is one of the best benefits that can still come out of Check 21. If only your bank were in a bigger hurry to give you the tools.

Source: Yahoo Finance

With roughly 6.7 million jobs lost since the start of the recession, it’s tempting – and often a great idea – to launch your own business. That way, of course, you can take matters into your own hands. No more rolling your eyes at the boss; it’s your show.

But many people do a lousy job of picking businesses they can realistically turn into a profitable operation.

“There’s this very sad pattern about how people start businesses,” says Scott Shane, an entrepreneurship professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. “People are most likely to start businesses in industries where start-ups are most likely to fail.”

The problem: Many would-be entrepreneurs are drawn to businesses they like to patronize or the ones that are cheapest and easiest to start. Instead, experts argue, aspiring entrepreneurs should create firms in which they have professional experience so they have a competitive advantage in the market.

So, what are most overrated businesses out there? We spoke with small business experts to find out. Here are seven you might want to think twice about – and then maybe twice more.

1. Restaurants. Dining out and cooking are among Americans’ favorite pastimes. But “restaurants are among the toughest businesses to run,” says Donna Ettenson, vice president of the Association of Small Business Development Centers in Burke, Va.

Far too many people assume their culinary abilities will lead to success in the restaurant business. Instead, about 60% of restaurants close in the first three years, according to a 2003 study at Ohio State University. That’s quite a bit higher than the roughly half of all start-ups that close in the first five years.

The reason: Restaurants typically have low profit margins and need strong managers who can run an ultra-tight ship through seasonal fluctuations and other struggles. Most people don’t have that kind of intense managerial ability to pull it off. By the way, the pitfalls are quite similar for restaurants’ cousin – the catering business. In other words, Chef Emptor.

2. Direct Sales. It’s a tempting pitch: Work from home and earn commissions by selling cosmetics, kitchen knives or cleaning products. But companies that recruit independent sales reps tend to attract new team members by pointing to the success of their highest earners.

A harder look shows that those high earners are making big money in large part by recruiting new reps into the organization and getting bonuses or a cut of their recruits’ commissions, says Ken Yancey, chief executive of SCORE, a Herndon, Va., organization of current and retired business executives who volunteer time counseling entrepreneurs. The new reps then have a much harder job because they need to recruit more people on top of selling product even though the number of reps out there is increasing.

The result, Yancey says: “Most of them wind up with a bunch of jewelry or kitchen equipment sitting in their basement that they can’t sell.”

3. Online Retail. By far, one of the easiest businesses to start is selling items through online marketplaces such as eBay or Amazon. But as online commerce ages and these sites fill up with more established retailers, it’s much harder for new, small sellers to compete for attention and generate a viable income.

“A lot of people are thinking it’s the Web of five or 10 years ago and you stand out simply because you’re on the Web,” says Rieva Lesonsky, chief executive of GrowBiz Media, a content and consulting company for small businesses based in Irvine, Calif.

Instead, successful online retailers today must have a handle on sourcing their products at a low enough price, then layering on clever online marketing and fine-tuned logistics. These businesses won’t generate much income if they can’t be easily found in searches, maintain a good reputation among buyers or add enough value so that sellers can build profit margins high enough to take on bigger players and physical stores.

4. High-End Retail. Many people dream of opening a day spa, luxury jewelry store or designer clothing boutique – businesses they feel good patronizing. But specialty retail businesses close at higher rates than non-specialty stores, according to the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy, and are even riskier now that consumer discretionary spending has dried up and people are no longer spending money on little luxuries.

“It’s going to be a long time before we return to the days of conspicuous consumption,” says Ms. Lesonsky of GrowBiz Media. High-end retailers often suffer from poor locations and lack of understanding of how to source and market their products in an effective way. In today’s economy and in coming years, she says, retail entrepreneurs should be looking to sell non-discretionary consumer goods or offer items at a value rather than high-end products.

5. Independent Consulting. Common advice for aspiring entrepreneurs is to stick with industries they know. So, for many looking to escape the corporate treadmill that means turning their professional expertise into a one-person consulting firm.

It seems practical – more companies are indeed relying on independent contractors and freelancers these days – but it’s not as easy to pull off as many imagine, says Dennis Ceru, an entrepreneurship professor at Babson College in Babson Park, Mass. Many consultants struggle with time management problems, spending so much time scouting work that it’s very difficult to earn steady income. “The difficulty many face is they go through peaks and valleys of having work,” says Prof. Ceru. “When the engagement ends, they are frantically looking for work,” which may take weeks or months.

A possible solution: “A successful consulting firm needs people to find the work, grind out the work and mind the work. Unless you know you can do all three yourself, you potentially expose your business to great risk.”

6. Franchise Ownership. The idea of being handed a proven business plan without the uncertainties and headaches that come with building a business from scratch is understandably alluring. But too many people don’t understand the risks associated with franchising and sign restrictive franchise agreements without thoroughly researching their franchisor and their contractual obligations, says SCORE’s Yancey.

Some franchisors, for instance, allow franchisees to open stores too close together, oversaturating the market. Or they simply require their franchisees pay so much in royalties and fees or other operational costs that it’s very difficult to be profitable. Beyond that, when a franchisee fails, a franchisor may make it extremely difficult and costly to get out of its contract.

It’s a myth that franchises are far more successful than independent businesses. A 1995 study by a researcher at Wayne State University found that 62% of franchises were open for business after four years, compared with 68% of independent businesses. And franchises were also found to be less profitable in those early years.

7. Traffic-Driven Web Sites. Everybody has witnessed the success of social-networking sites like Facebook and popular blogs that generate all their revenue off advertising. But as the Internet ages, that’s much harder to accomplish, says Martin Zwilling, a start-up consultant in Fountain Hills, Ariz., who specializes in helping entrepreneurs find angel investors.

Zwilling says he hears pitches for new social-networking sites about once a week, but actively deters people from starting them. “I say, skip it,” he says. “You need to invest $50 million to get any presence” in the social-networking space right now and it’s very difficult to get people to leave established sites. What’s more, he says, the amount of traffic needed to build a lucrative traffic-driven Web site is far more than most new Web entrepreneurs realize: “Until you get to the point where you have a million page views a day, you’re nowhere.”

Source:  Yahoo Small Business Center

By Matthew Bandyk Matthew Bandyk – US News and World Report

The “Great Recession” is the name that has stuck for the economic decline that began in late 2007. But there’s some reason to think that using the word recession is being kind.

The U.S. gross domestic product has shrunk 3.9 percent in the past year, the worst drop since the Great Depression. Plenty of observers are willing to say that this recession is much deeper than anything we’ve seen since the 1930s–including the big dip in the early 1980s, generally accepted as the other candidate for the worst recession since the Great Depression. “I think it’s way worse today,” says Ridgely Evers of Tapit Partners, a longtime entrepreneur and venture capitalist who founded the software company Netbooks (now known as WorkingPoint). In the recession of 1981 and 1982, “people recognized it as a dip. [Today,] nobody thinks we are going to come back out in relatively short order.” This recession seems to have dragged on longer. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the U.S. economy was in recession from July 1981 to November 1982–16 months. But the current recession started in December 2007, says the NBER, so it’s already longer than the last big one.

The NBER defines a “recession” based on the all-encompassing gross domestic product figure. That economy-wide statistic may not mean much to the average American. In other words, the question “What is the economy’s output?” usually doesn’t matter as much as “How hard is it to find a job?” When we look at that question, how does the “Great Recession” compare?

The unemployment rate is a murky number. It seems simple enough to look at the national unemployment figures released every month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In July, that number was 9.4 percent. At the peak of the early ’80s recession–December 1982–unemployment hit 10.8 percent.

So where’s the murkiness? The problem is that many of the people one would think of as “unemployed” are not included in this unemployment rate. For one, the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not count unemployed people who have been discouraged by the labor market and have given up looking for work. You are counted as a “discouraged worker” if you are available to work, want to work, and tried to look for work in the past year but gave up within four weeks for reasons including the belief that no work is available. The fact that the national unemployment rate excludes these discouraged workers has led many observers to believe it does not reflect the “real” level of unemployment. “Ask the average person if he or she is unemployed, and there is little hesitation in giving you an answer, but that may not agree with government definitions,” says John Williams, an economist who examines government statistics at shadowstats.com.

Other people who aren’t counted in the official number are those who have been forced by the economy to work part time. The number of workers who wanted full-time jobs but could find only part-time work was 1.8 million last month, which amounts to 1.3 percent of the labor force. Still, that’s not as bad as December 1982, when forced part-time workers accounted for 3 percent of the labor force.

What happens when you start counting all these people who have been heavily battered by the labor market? The Bureau of Labor Statistics has another rate that includes “marginally affected workers” and part-time workers. That number, referred to as U-6 because of its identification in bureaureports, was 16.3 percent last month–nearly 7 percentage points higher than the official unemployment rate. What’s more, the number of people who have given up on finding work has been steadily rising over the past few months, from 685,000 in May to 796,000 in July. “If you have that number of people leaving the workforce, that seems to me a serious problem,” says economist John Lott.

Many people are giving up because the labor market is so bad–but how bad historically? A U-6 rate of more than 16 percent certainly does not compare to the Great Depression, when a quarter of the workforce was unemployed. And Williams points out that a much larger number of workers were agricultural workers in the 1930s. These farm workers are not included in today’s statistics. So, by his estimates, nonfarm unemployment was at 35 percent in 1933). Trying to compare that U-6 number with the early ’80s recession gets a bit tricky. The U-6 measurement did not come into use until 1994. Before that, the Bureau of Labor Statistics used a broader measurement, referred to as U-7, to figure out the number of unemployed plus workers dropping out of the labor force. In 1982, U-7 hit a peak of 15.3 percent, below the current U-6 of 16.3 percent. But 1982 should probably look even better compared with the labor market of today. U-7 overestimates the number of discouraged workers compared with how we measure them today. For example, the Bureau of Labor Statistics started asking people in surveys if they were actually available to work. These and other changes reduced the measurement of discouraged workers by 50 percent, according to some estimates.

So if you care not just about people who meet the official definition of “unemployed” but also about people who are dropping out of the labor force, 2009 seems to be trailing 1982 in terms of the health of the labor market. Williams says that when he takes into consideration people who haven’t looked for work in more than a year because they can’t find jobs, the real unemployment rate today goes all the way up to 20.6 percent by his calculations. “It won’t take much to get it to the worst since the Great Depression,” he says.